Review: The Littlest Viking

Small scale story about a Viking prince andThe_Littlest_Viking_usvideocover his future and foes. While almost everything you expect from a Viking movie is included, the script is weak and the wigs are silly!

It has long been important in the Norwegian film industry to deliberately cater to all age categories, and as the Viking film genre matured in the 80s, they decided to spend the little money they had on Viking action for children. Basically, their only logical option was to adapt a book by Torill Thorstad Hauger, who in the 70s and 80s wrote several childrens’ books set in the Viking age. The Littlest Viking (original title: Sigurd Drakedreper) is aimed at children aged aproximately 9 – 14, just so you are warned to not expect any brutal violence in this particular Viking film.

Told from the perspective of the young teen Sigurd, son of the local earl, the film is a coming-of-age story about unconnected expectations. The earl hopes and expects his son to grow up to become a tough warrior and leader, while Sigurd is not so interested in violence and takes more interest in carpentry and wood carving. He doesn’t even want to punish the slaves, so he is laughed at and mocked, but when his father the earl is killed during a raid, he must grow up over night, wether he wants it or not.

sigurd3“Growing up” in this case means to reject violence, make friends and be understanding – worthy notions indeed, but this is spread so thick in the story that one wonders if the makers of the film could not maintain two thoughts at the same time, in spite of being a team of two writers and directors. The moral of the film, or message, is of course simplified for the intended audience, but it would have been more interesting if other standards were suggested and tested against the peaceful spirit of Sigurd. The idea of peace and forgiveness can only be shown as radical and strong if measured against other ideals, which a Viking movie can include without problems. The crude versions of justice, revenge and pride, for example, so evident in many movies about violent societies. Here, the consequences of violence is shown as bad in only one instance – when Sigurd’s father dies – but there was no reflection about the necessity of violence, or why it was the way of life for the Vikings. OK, so not everything can be included in a movie, but they could have smeared Sigurd a little less thick and given his personality motivation and purpose.

It is also annoying to see how the 90 minute film wastes much of its time setting up the Sigurd character and some supporting characters, only to prepare us for events that can be predicted from the beginning of the movie. The important aspects of the film is left to the last third, which again underlines the script’s priority flaws. The only original twist that can be found is how Sigurd does not fall in love with anyone, which otherwise would be an expected feature in most movies about a teen boy and his emotions. There are some other smaller positive points in the story, too; the film briefly points at aspects of Viking life as it probably was back then – a strong female leader of the family, the occasional positive relationship between rulers and slaves, and the diversity of the Vikings’ subsistence. These points are not important in the story, and not much time is given to them either, so they are not really doing much to the overall experience of the film.

As mentioned, there is no brutal violence in this film given its target audience, but there is in fact quite a few action scenes, both with and without violence. No graphic stuff of course, but still enough to satisfy 9 year olds looking for an entertaining Viking film. For the discerning viewer however, these scenes are badly choreographed and filmed. Not horse poo stinky badly, just “we have a small budget and no experience in action choreography” bad, another “bonus” in Norwegian films pre-90s. The film is certainly not an epic, particularly in the action department, even though they still deserve credit for trying to pump up adrenalin here and there (not something you’d expect in Norwegian genre movies of the 80s).


While kept on a relatively small scale (filmed in only a few locations and on small sets), everything else you expect from a Viking movie is also included; longboats arriving from raids, bearded axe-throwers, helmets with fancy decorations, Irish slaves, thing gatherings and amazing fjord views. Some costumes and houses look wrong, but overall the film is quite realistic and down-to-earth, a tone that suits it well. With that budget, it would have been a failure to try to make it look bigger or more inventive. What the budget cannot prevent no matter how big it is though, is the wooden acting by the professional adults, but that also goes without saying in Norwegian 80s movies.

For children and young teens The littlest Viking might just work, but for adults it is too poorly made to be anything but a special interest item. I recall this movie from when I was young, and didn’t like it much then either, and now I see why. The charming aspects are few and far between, and I cannot get that incredibly silly wig out of my head either!

Rated 4 of 10.

Directed by Knut W. Jorfald & Lars Rasmussen.

Norway, 1989.


  1. […] The second chapter shows us how the Vikings themselves were haunted by dragons. Not only did they believe that a giant serpent surrounded the entire world, but they also used dragons in a more solid way, as symbolic decorations extended from the bow or stern. The big Viking dragon in the legends even had a name; Fafnir, a former human turned dragon who was killed by Sigurd, a famous character in Viking mythology. Not only is the myth of Sigurd explained in this documentary; his work is actually depicted in runestones, and was also the subject of a Norwegian Viking film for children, The littlest Viking. […]

Comments are closed.